Insights
Plain-language notes on groundwater evidence
How models, chemistry, forensic geology, and water-quality data behave when someone is checking the file. Written for counsel and technical leads. Educational only—not legal advice for your matter.
What counsel should look for in a hydrogeology expert witness
What to look for in a hydrogeology expert witness: licensure, site-type experience, writing for the record, and how to start a conflict check.
Read article →What a fate and transport model report should show
A checklist for fate and transport model reports: conceptual model, calibration, sensitivity, scenarios, and what a reviewer must be able to reproduce.
Read article →Water quality investigations that hold up when the data are challenged
How to design and defend a water quality investigation: the decision, screen intervals, sampling bias, QA/QC, and legacy data that still have to hold.
Read article →Forensic geology in environmental litigation
How forensic geology uses stratigraphy, fill, and pathway hypotheses in environmental disputes, and where sparse boring control limits the opinion.
Read article →· Updated October 15, 2026
Groundwater modeling and admissibility: documentation that holds up
What decision-makers scrutinize in a groundwater model: conceptual site model, calibration targets, sensitivity, and a file counsel can audit.
Read article →· Updated October 15, 2026
Hydrogeochemistry for source questions: lines of evidence that hold
How hydrogeochemistry, geology, and groundwater flow are used together to evaluate sources and commingled plumes without overclaiming.
Read article →